Hunter 356 vs 2003 Dehler 42 DS — Comparison

Hunter 356Hunter 356
VS
2003 Dehler 42 DS

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3562003 Dehler 42 DS
General
ManufacturerHunterDehler
Year2000–20052003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn HendersonJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)12.77 m (41.9 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)11.20 m (36.7 ft)
Beam3.53 m (11.6 ft)3.93 m (12.9 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,800 kg (19,401 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
2003 Dehler 42 DS
18.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
2003 Dehler 42 DS
34.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
2003 Dehler 42 DS
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
2003 Dehler 42 DS
16.03

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 2003 Dehler 42 DS represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2003 Dehler 42 DS is a 2000s offering from Dehler from Germany. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 2003 Dehler 42 DS at 12.77m (41.9ft) with a 3.93m beam. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS is 1.95m longer than the Hunter 356. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS, with an SA/D of 18.59 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2003 Dehler 42 DS has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 34.1% for the 2003 Dehler 42 DS, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2003 Dehler 42 DS offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 356 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Dehler 42 DS has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Dehler 42 DS offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 2003 Dehler 42 DS