Hunter 356 vs 2006 Tartan 4400 — Comparison
Hunter 356
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 356 | 2006 Tartan 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Tartan |
| Year | 2000–2005 | 2006–2014 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Tim Jackett |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 13.41 m (44.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.53 m (11.6 ft) | 4.11 m (13.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 2.23 m (7.3 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 11,340 kg (25,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 53.0 m² (571 ft²) | 88.0 m² (947 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 230 L (60.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 416 L (109.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 356 and 2006 Tartan 4400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2006 Tartan 4400 is a 2000s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2006 Tartan 4400 was designed by Tim Jackett.
In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 2006 Tartan 4400 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.11m beam. The 2006 Tartan 4400 is 2.59m longer than the Hunter 356. The 2006 Tartan 4400 displaces approximately 108% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 2006 Tartan 4400, with an SA/D of 17.71 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2006 Tartan 4400 has a comfort ratio of 18.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 40.0% for the 2006 Tartan 4400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 416L water and 230L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2006 Tartan 4400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 2006 Tartan 4400