2000 Najad 355 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

2000 Najad 355
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Najad 3551978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerNajadCape Dory
Year2000–20101978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.72 m (35.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.0 m² (549 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity110 L (29.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Najad 355
15.69
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Najad 355
40.00
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Najad 355
0.75
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Najad 355
20.10
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Najad 355 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 2.49m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 120% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Najad 355 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Najad 355 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Najad 355 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 1978 Cape Dory 270