2000 Najad 355 vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

2000 Najad 355
VS
1983 Freedom 361983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Najad 3551983 Freedom 36
General
ManufacturerNajadFreedom
Year2000–20101983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.72 m (35.2 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.0 m² (549 ft²)49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity110 L (29.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Najad 355
15.69
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Najad 355
40.00
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Najad 355
0.75
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Najad 355
20.10
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Najad 355 and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 0.25m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Najad 355 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Najad 355 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 1983 Freedom 36