2000 Najad 355 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

2000 Najad 355
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Najad 3551987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerNajadCape Dory
Year2000–20101987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.72 m (35.2 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.0 m² (549 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity110 L (29.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Najad 355
15.69
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Najad 355
40.00
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Najad 355
0.75
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Najad 355
20.10
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Najad 355 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 1.47m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Najad 355 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Najad 355 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 1987 Cape Dory 40