2000 Najad 355 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison
1996 Moody 45
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Najad 355 | 1996 Moody 45 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Moody |
| Year | 2000–2010 | 1996–2002 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | UK |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) | 4.22 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) | 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) | 85.0 m² (915 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 110 L (29.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 450 L (118.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Najad 355 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 3.00m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 108% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Moody 45 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Moody 45 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 1996 Moody 45