2000 Najad 355 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Najad 355 | 2003 Sabre 402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Sabre |
| Year | 2000–2010 | 2003–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 110 L (29.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Najad 355 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 1.47m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 2003 Sabre 402