2000 Sabre 386 vs 1988 Westerly Corsair — Comparison

2000 Sabre 386
VS
1988 Westerly Corsair1988 Westerly Corsair

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Sabre 3861988 Westerly Corsair
General
ManufacturerSabreWesterly
Year2000–20071988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerJim TaylorEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.50 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,450 kg (5,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
1988 Westerly Corsair
14.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
1988 Westerly Corsair
38.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
1988 Westerly Corsair
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Sabre 386
19.37
1988 Westerly Corsair
19.55

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Sabre 386 and 1988 Westerly Corsair represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1988 Westerly Corsair is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2000 Sabre 386 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1988 Westerly Corsair was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2000 Sabre 386 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1988 Westerly Corsair at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.50m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.58m longer than the 1988 Westerly Corsair. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Sabre 386 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1988 Westerly Corsair, with an SA/D of 14.81 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Sabre 386 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Westerly Corsair has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386 and 38.6% for the 1988 Westerly Corsair, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Sabre 386 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Westerly Corsair is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Sabre 386 · 1988 Westerly Corsair