2000 Sabre 386 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Sabre 386 | 2013 Elan 350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Elan |
| Year | 2000–2007 | 2013–2018 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | Jim Taylor | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 3.46 m (11.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) | 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) | 58.0 m² (624 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Sabre 386 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2000 Sabre 386 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 2000 Sabre 386 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.91m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Sabre 386 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Sabre 386 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Sabre 386 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Sabre 386 · 2013 Elan 350