2000 Nautor Swan 56 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

2000 Nautor Swan 56 2000 Nautor Swan 56
VS
2013 Moody 54 2013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Nautor Swan 56 2013 Moody 54
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Moody
Year 2000–2007 2013–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Germany
Designer German Frers Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 17.07 m (56.0 ft) 16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL 14.00 m (45.9 ft) 14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam 4.55 m (14.9 ft) 4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft 2.60 m (8.5 ft) 2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 20,000 kg (44,092 lbs) 21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 128.0 m² (1,378 ft²) 125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 110 HP 110 HP
Fuel Capacity 400 L (105.7 gal) 450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity 650 L (171.7 gal) 700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 4 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Nautor Swan 56
17.64
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Nautor Swan 56
39.00
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Nautor Swan 56
0.67
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Nautor Swan 56
18.34
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2000 Nautor Swan 56 measures 17.07m (56.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.55m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 is 0.89m longer than the 2013 Moody 54. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Nautor Swan 56 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.64 and 128.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Nautor Swan 56 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 2000 Nautor Swan 56 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Nautor Swan 56 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 650L of water capacity and 400L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Nautor Swan 56 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS