Bavaria 40 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

Bavaria 40Bavaria 40
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 401983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerBavariaIrwin
Year2001–20061983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA12.35 m (40.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL10.75 m (35.3 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.99 m (13.1 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.0 m² (775 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 40
17.56
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 40
30.59
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 40
0.78
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 40
16.39
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 40 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 40 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The Bavaria 40 was penned by J&J Design. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 40 measures 12.35m (40.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.99m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Bavaria 40 is 2.60m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The Bavaria 40 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Bavaria 40 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 40 · 1983 Irwin 32