2001 Hunter 410 vs 1985 Irwin 38 — Comparison

2001 Hunter 4102001 Hunter 410
VS
1985 Irwin 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2001 Hunter 4101985 Irwin 38
General
ManufacturerHunterIrwin
Year2001–20061985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam4.04 m (13.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Hunter 410
16.80
1985 Irwin 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Hunter 410
38.10
1985 Irwin 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Hunter 410
0.76
1985 Irwin 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Hunter 410
18.10
1985 Irwin 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Hunter 410 and 1985 Irwin 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Hunter 410 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1985 Irwin 38 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2001 Hunter 410 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1985 Irwin 38 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 2001 Hunter 410 measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.04m, compared to the 1985 Irwin 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 2001 Hunter 410 is 0.92m longer than the 1985 Irwin 38. The 2001 Hunter 410 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Hunter 410 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 1985 Irwin 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2001 Hunter 410 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Hunter 410 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1985 Irwin 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 2001 Hunter 410 and 42.4% for the 1985 Irwin 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Hunter 410 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1985 Irwin 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Irwin 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Hunter 410 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2001 Hunter 410 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2001 Hunter 410 · 1985 Irwin 38