2001 Nautor Swan 42 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

2001 Nautor Swan 42
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2001 Nautor Swan 42Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanHunter
Year2001–20062000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUSA
DesignerGerman FrersGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft2.30 m (7.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area82.0 m² (883 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
18.84
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
40.86
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
0.75
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
17.22
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is 1.98m longer than the Hunter 356. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.84 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2001 Nautor Swan 42 · Hunter 356