2001 Nautor Swan 42 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

2001 Nautor Swan 42
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2001 Nautor Swan 422009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanBeneteau
Year2001–20062009–2013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerGerman FrersFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.30 m (7.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area82.0 m² (883 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
18.84
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
40.86
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
0.75
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
17.22
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 was penned by German Frers. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is 2.36m longer than the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.84 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2001 Nautor Swan 42 · 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34