Hanse 400 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerHanseCal
Year2002–20061979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.21m longer than the 1979 Cal 39. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1979 Cal 39