Hanse 400 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerHanseNautor Swan
Year2002–20061981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFinland
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hanse 400 is 1.13m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36