Hanse 400 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHanseWesterly
Year2002–20061982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.60m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1982 Westerly Konsort