2002 Najad 440 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

2002 Najad 440
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Najad 4401990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerNajadSabre
Year2002–20101990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA13.50 m (44.3 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL11.20 m (36.7 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam4.10 m (13.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area88.0 m² (947 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity480 L (126.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Najad 440
17.55
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Najad 440
39.13
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Najad 440
0.73
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Najad 440
19.08
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Najad 440 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Najad 440 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2002 Najad 440 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 2002 Najad 440 measures 13.50m (44.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.10m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2002 Najad 440 is 2.53m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The 2002 Najad 440 displaces approximately 95% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Najad 440 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.55 and 88.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2002 Najad 440 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Najad 440 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 2002 Najad 440 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Najad 440 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 480L of water capacity and 280L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Najad 440 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Najad 440 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Najad 440 · 1990 Sabre 36