2003 Catalina 310 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

2003 Catalina 310 2003 Catalina 310
VS
1982 Freedom 28 1982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2003 Catalina 310 1982 Freedom 28
General
Manufacturer Catalina Freedom
Year 2003–2007 1982–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 8.38 m (27.5 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.30 m (10.8 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 45.3 m² (488 ft²) 29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Catalina 310
16.80
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Catalina 310
39.99
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Catalina 310
0.80
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Catalina 310
18.77
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Catalina 310 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Catalina 310 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 2003 Catalina 310 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 2003 Catalina 310 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 2003 Catalina 310 is 0.92m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The 2003 Catalina 310 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Catalina 310 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 45.3 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Catalina 310 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Catalina 310 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Catalina 310 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Catalina 310 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Catalina 310 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Catalina 310 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Catalina 310 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS