Catalina 42 MkII vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

Catalina 42 MkII
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 42 MkII1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerCatalinaPearson
Year2003–20091984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL11.10 m (36.4 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area76.0 m² (818 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 42 MkII
17.18
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 42 MkII
38.10
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 42 MkII
0.75
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 42 MkII
17.36
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 42 MkII and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Catalina 42 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Catalina 42 MkII measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Catalina 42 MkII is 2.44m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The Catalina 42 MkII displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 42 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 42 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 42 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 42 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 42 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 42 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 42 MkII · 1984 Pearson 34