Hunter 212 vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison
Hunter 212
1984 O'Day 30
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 212 | 1984 O'Day 30 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | O'Day |
| Year | 2003–2008 | 1984–1989 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | C. Raymond Hunt |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 6.35 m (20.8 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| LWL | 5.56 m (18.2 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.26 m (7.4 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 0.99 m (3.2 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 680 kg (1,499 lbs) | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 168 kg (370 lbs) | 1,452 kg (3,201 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 16.0 m² (172 ft²) | 36.0 m² (388 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Centerboard | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 4 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 15 L (4.0 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 3 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 212 and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 212 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The Hunter 212 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.
In terms of size, the Hunter 212 measures 6.35m (20.8ft) overall with a beam of 2.26m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1984 O'Day 30 is 2.79m longer than the Hunter 212. The 1984 O'Day 30 displaces approximately 434% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 212 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 21.04 and 16.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 212 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 212 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 10.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.03). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 24.7% for the Hunter 212 and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 212 provides 3 berths in 1 cabin with 15L of water capacity and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 O'Day 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 212 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 O'Day 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.