2003 Hunter 41 AC vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 AC1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
ManufacturerHunterHallberg-Rassy
Year2003–20071997–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 2.15m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34