2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Hunter 41 AC | Catalina 36 MkII |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Catalina |
| Year | 2003–2007 | 1999–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) |
| Beam | 4.09 m (13.4 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) | 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.2 m² (788 ft²) | 56.5 m² (608 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Shoal draft | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 1.53m longer than the Catalina 36 MkII. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 36 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Catalina 36 MkII