2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Hanse 320 — Comparison
Hanse 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Hunter 41 AC | Hanse 320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hanse |
| Year | 2003–2007 | 2005–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) |
| LWL | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) |
| Beam | 4.09 m (13.4 ft) | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.2 m² (788 ft²) | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Shoal draft | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 90 L (23.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 6 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 2.58m longer than the Hanse 320. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Hanse 320