2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Bavaria C42 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC 2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
Bavaria C42 Bavaria C42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2003 Hunter 41 AC Bavaria C42
General
Manufacturer Hunter Bavaria
Year 2003–2007 2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Glenn Henderson cossutti yacht design
Dimensions
LOA 12.50 m (41.0 ft) 12.88 m (42.3 ft)
LWL 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 11.25 m (36.9 ft)
Beam 4.09 m (13.4 ft) 4.09 m (13.4 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) 8,900 kg (19,621 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,750 kg (6,063 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 73.2 m² (788 ft²) 76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Shoal draft Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 45 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
Bavaria C42
17.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
Bavaria C42
30.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
Bavaria C42
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
Bavaria C42
15.20

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Bavaria C42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria C42 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria C42 was designed by cossutti yacht design.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Bavaria C42 at 12.88m (42.3ft) with a 4.09m beam. The Bavaria C42 is 0.38m longer than the 2003 Hunter 41 AC. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Bavaria C42, with an SA/D of 17.98 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria C42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Bavaria C42 has a comfort ratio of 15.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 30.9% for the Bavaria C42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Bavaria C42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria C42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS