2003 Sabre 402 vs 1985 Irwin 38 — Comparison
2003 Sabre 402
1985 Irwin 38
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Sabre 402 | 1985 Irwin 38 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Irwin |
| Year | 2003–2010 | 1985–1991 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Jim Taylor | Ted Irwin |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Sabre 402 and 1985 Irwin 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1985 Irwin 38 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2003 Sabre 402 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1985 Irwin 38 was designed by Ted Irwin.
In terms of size, the 2003 Sabre 402 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1985 Irwin 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 0.61m longer than the 1985 Irwin 38. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Sabre 402 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Irwin 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Sabre 402 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1985 Irwin 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402 and 42.4% for the 1985 Irwin 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Sabre 402 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1985 Irwin 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1985 Irwin 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.