2004 Bavaria 38 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

2004 Bavaria 38
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Bavaria 381992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerBavariaMoody
Year2004–20091992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerJ&J DesignBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA11.72 m (38.5 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.70
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Bavaria 38
33.33
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Bavaria 38
0.77
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.94
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Bavaria 38 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Bavaria 38 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2004 Bavaria 38 was penned by J&J Design. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2004 Bavaria 38 measures 11.72m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 0.78m longer than the 2004 Bavaria 38. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Bavaria 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.70 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Bavaria 38 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Bavaria 38 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Bavaria 38 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Bavaria 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Bavaria 38 · 1992 Moody 41