Bavaria 46 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

Bavaria 46Bavaria 46
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 462000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerBavariaSabre
Year2004–20092000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA14.27 m (46.8 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam4.35 m (14.3 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,200 kg (24,692 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area95.0 m² (1,023 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity450 L (118.9 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths107
Cabins42

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 46
19.28
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 46
31.25
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 46
0.78
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 46
14.30
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 46 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 46 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Bavaria 46 was penned by J&J Design. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 46 measures 14.27m (46.8ft) overall with a beam of 4.35m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Bavaria 46 is 2.69m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The Bavaria 46 displaces approximately 54% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 46 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.28 and 95.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 31.3% for the Bavaria 46 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 46 provides 10 berths in 4 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 46 · 2000 Sabre 386