Hanse 370 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

Hanse 370
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3701972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerHanseContest
Year2004–20081972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyNetherlands
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.10 m (33.1 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.63 m (11.9 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.0 m² (646 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 370
16.98
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 370
30.88
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 370
0.77
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 370
17.05
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 370 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 370 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The Hanse 370 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the Hanse 370 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.63m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 370 is 1.95m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The Hanse 370 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 370 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 370 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 370 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 370 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 370 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 370 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 370 · 1972 Contest 31