Hanse 370 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

Hanse 370
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3701990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerHanseFeeling
Year2004–20081990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL10.10 m (33.1 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.63 m (11.9 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.0 m² (646 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 370
16.98
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 370
30.88
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 370
0.77
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 370
17.05
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 370 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 370 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hanse 370 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Hanse 370 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.63m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hanse 370 is 1.55m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The Hanse 370 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 370 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 370 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 370 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 370 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 370 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 370 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 370 · 1990 Feeling 32