Hanse 370 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

Hanse 370
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3702013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHanseBeneteau
Year2004–20082013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.10 m (33.1 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.63 m (11.9 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.0 m² (646 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 370
16.98
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 370
30.88
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 370
0.77
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 370
17.05
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 370 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 370 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The Hanse 370 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the Hanse 370 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.63m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 370 is 1.30m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The Hanse 370 displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 370 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 370 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 370 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 370 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 370 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 370 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3