Hanse 430 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison

Hanse 430 Hanse 430
VS
Catalina 387 Catalina 387

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 430 Catalina 387
General
Manufacturer Hanse Catalina
Year 2004–2009 1996–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 13.10 m (43.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 11.40 m (37.4 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 4.10 m (13.5 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 2.05 m (6.7 ft) 1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs) 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,900 kg (6,393 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 81.0 m² (872 ft²) 63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 350 L (92.5 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 430
18.74
Catalina 387
16.73
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 430
31.52
Catalina 387
39.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 430
0.78
Catalina 387
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 430
15.21
Catalina 387
18.47

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 430 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 430 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 430 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the Hanse 430 measures 13.10m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.10m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Hanse 430 is 1.52m longer than the Catalina 387. The Hanse 430 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 430 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.74 and 81.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 430 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 430 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 31.5% for the Hanse 430 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 430 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 430 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 430 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS