2004 Hunter 466 vs 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 466 2004 Hunter 466
VS
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2004 Hunter 466 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
General
Manufacturer Hunter Jeanneau
Year 2004–2008 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Glenn Henderson Daniel Andrieu
Dimensions
LOA 14.17 m (46.5 ft) 13.10 m (43.0 ft)
LWL 12.50 m (41.0 ft) 11.40 m (37.4 ft)
Beam 4.37 m (14.3 ft) 4.08 m (13.4 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 12,247 kg (27,000 lbs) 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 90.5 m² (974 ft²) 78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 379 L (100.1 gal) 300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
32.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
15.31

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 is a 2000s offering from Jeanneau from France. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 was designed by Daniel Andrieu.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 at 13.10m (43.0ft) with a 4.08m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 1.07m longer than the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has a comfort ratio of 15.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 32.6% for the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2004 Hunter 466 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS