Bavaria 49 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Bavaria 49Bavaria 49
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 492003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerBavariaSabre
Year2005–20092003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA14.98 m (49.1 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL13.10 m (43.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam4.49 m (14.7 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area102.0 m² (1,098 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity500 L (132.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths107
Cabins42

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 49
18.74
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 49
32.31
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 49
0.77
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 49
14.47
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 49 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 49 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Bavaria 49 was penned by J&J Design. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 49 measures 14.98m (49.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.49m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The Bavaria 49 is 2.79m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The Bavaria 49 displaces approximately 59% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 49 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.74 and 102.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 49 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 49 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 32.3% for the Bavaria 49 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 49 provides 10 berths in 4 cabins with 500L of water capacity and 280L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 49 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 49 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 49 · 2003 Sabre 402