Hanse 320 vs 1975 Ericson 25+ — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1975 Ericson 25+ 1975 Ericson 25+

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1975 Ericson 25+
General
Manufacturer Hanse Ericson
Year 2005–2010 1975–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Bruce King
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 6.25 m (20.5 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 726 kg (1,601 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 25.0 m² (269 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 7 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 23 L (6.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1975 Ericson 25+
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1975 Ericson 25+
38.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1975 Ericson 25+
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1975 Ericson 25+
20.11

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1975 Ericson 25+ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1975 Ericson 25+ is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1975 Ericson 25+ was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1975 Ericson 25+ at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The Hanse 320 is 2.30m longer than the 1975 Ericson 25+. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 141% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Ericson 25+, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 25.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1975 Ericson 25+ has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 38.1% for the 1975 Ericson 25+, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1975 Ericson 25+ offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L water and 23L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Ericson 25+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS