Hanse 320 vs 1980 Contest 33 — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3201980 Contest 33
General
ManufacturerHanseContest
Year2005–20101980–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyNetherlands
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1980 Contest 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1980 Contest 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1980 Contest 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1980 Contest 33
22.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1980 Contest 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1980 Contest 33 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1980 Contest 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1980 Contest 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1980 Contest 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1980 Contest 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1980 Contest 33