Hanse 320 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison
Hanse 320
1988 Moody 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | 1988 Moody 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Moody |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 1988–1993 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | UK |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 54.0 m² (581 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 1.05m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 48% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1988 Moody 36