Hanse 320 vs Catalina 42 MkII — Comparison
Hanse 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | Catalina 42 MkII |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Catalina |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 2003–2009 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 12.80 m (42.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 11.10 m (36.4 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 76.0 m² (818 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 152 L (40.2 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 303 L (80.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and Catalina 42 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 42 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 42 MkII at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Catalina 42 MkII is 2.88m longer than the Hanse 320. The Catalina 42 MkII displaces approximately 107% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 42 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 42 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 42 MkII has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The Catalina 42 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L water and 152L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 42 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 42 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · Catalina 42 MkII