Hanse 320 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3202003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerHanseSabre
Year2005–20102003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.27m longer than the Hanse 320. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 2003 Sabre 402