2005 Najad 460 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

2005 Najad 460
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Najad 4601987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerNajadCape Dory
Year2005–20131987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA14.10 m (46.3 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL11.80 m (38.7 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,500 kg (29,762 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area97.0 m² (1,044 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine100 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity320 L (84.5 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity560 L (147.9 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Najad 460
17.38
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Najad 460
38.52
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Najad 460
0.71
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Najad 460
19.66
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Najad 460 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Najad 460 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2005 Najad 460 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2005 Najad 460 measures 14.10m (46.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 2005 Najad 460 is 1.91m longer than the 1987 Cape Dory 40. The 2005 Najad 460 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Najad 460 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 97.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Najad 460 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Najad 460 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2005 Najad 460 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Najad 460 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 560L of water capacity and 320L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Najad 460 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Najad 460 · 1987 Cape Dory 40