2005 Sabre 426 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

2005 Sabre 4262005 Sabre 426
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Sabre 4261979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerSabrePearson
Year2005–20121979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJim TaylorWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,979 kg (22,000 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area77.5 m² (834 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Sabre 426
16.99
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Sabre 426
38.64
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Sabre 426
0.74
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Sabre 426
19.02
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Sabre 426 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 2005 Sabre 426 is 1.67m longer than the 1979 Pearson 37. The 2005 Sabre 426 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Sabre 426 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Sabre 426 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2005 Sabre 426 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · 1979 Pearson 37