2006 Catalina 375 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

2006 Catalina 375 2006 Catalina 375
VS
1972 Contest 31 1972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2006 Catalina 375 1972 Contest 31
General
Manufacturer Catalina Contest
Year 2006–2013 1972–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Netherlands
Designer Gerry Douglas Dick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.4 m² (672 ft²) 39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Steel
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Catalina 375
16.24
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Catalina 375
41.17
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Catalina 375
0.75
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Catalina 375
18.62
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Catalina 375 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Catalina 375 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 2006 Catalina 375 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 2006 Catalina 375 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2006 Catalina 375 is 2.13m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 2006 Catalina 375 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Catalina 375 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2006 Catalina 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Catalina 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 2006 Catalina 375 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Catalina 375 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Catalina 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Catalina 375 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS