2006 Catalina 375 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

2006 Catalina 3752006 Catalina 375
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Catalina 3751976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerCatalinaEricson
Year2006–20131976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasBruce King
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Catalina 375
16.24
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Catalina 375
41.17
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Catalina 375
0.75
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Catalina 375
18.62
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Catalina 375 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Catalina 375 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2006 Catalina 375 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 2006 Catalina 375 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 2006 Catalina 375 is 2.74m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 2006 Catalina 375 displaces approximately 143% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Catalina 375 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Catalina 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Catalina 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 2006 Catalina 375 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Catalina 375 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Catalina 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Catalina 375 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Catalina 375 · 1976 Ericson 29