2006 Catalina 375 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2006 Catalina 3752006 Catalina 375
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Catalina 3752013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerCatalinaBeneteau
Year2006–20132013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGerry DouglasVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths72
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Catalina 375
16.24
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Catalina 375
41.17
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Catalina 375
0.75
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Catalina 375
18.62
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Catalina 375 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Catalina 375 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2006 Catalina 375 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2006 Catalina 375 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2006 Catalina 375 is 1.48m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2006 Catalina 375 displaces approximately 124% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Catalina 375 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Catalina 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 2006 Catalina 375 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Catalina 375 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Catalina 375 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Catalina 375 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Catalina 375 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3