Hanse 342 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison
Hanse 342
1979 Pearson 37
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | 1979 Pearson 37 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Pearson |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1979–1985 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 11.28 m (37.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.43 m (11.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 7,258 kg (16,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 3,084 kg (6,799 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 190 L (50.2 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 0.98m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1979 Pearson 37