Hanse 342 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerHanseWesterly
Year2006–20101979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Hanse 342 is 0.55m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar