Hanse 342 vs 1983 Tartan 37 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1983 Tartan 371983 Tartan 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421983 Tartan 37
General
ManufacturerHanseTartan
Year2006–20101983–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1983 Tartan 37
15.45
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1983 Tartan 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1983 Tartan 37
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1983 Tartan 37
21.48

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1983 Tartan 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1983 Tartan 37 is a 1980s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1983 Tartan 37 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1983 Tartan 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1983 Tartan 37 is 0.98m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1983 Tartan 37 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Tartan 37, with an SA/D of 15.45 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1983 Tartan 37 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 42.5% for the 1983 Tartan 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1983 Tartan 37 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Tartan 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Tartan 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1983 Tartan 37