Hanse 342 vs 1997 Tartan 3700 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1997 Tartan 3700

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421997 Tartan 3700
General
ManufacturerHanseTartan
Year2006–20101997–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coTim Jackett
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)7,031 kg (15,501 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1997 Tartan 3700
17.16
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1997 Tartan 3700
41.93
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1997 Tartan 3700
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1997 Tartan 3700
18.41

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1997 Tartan 3700 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1997 Tartan 3700 is a 1990s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1997 Tartan 3700 was designed by Tim Jackett.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1997 Tartan 3700 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1997 Tartan 3700 is 0.98m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1997 Tartan 3700 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1997 Tartan 3700, with an SA/D of 17.16 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1997 Tartan 3700 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 41.9% for the 1997 Tartan 3700, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1997 Tartan 3700 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 220L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Tartan 3700 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1997 Tartan 3700