Hanse 342 vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
Catalina 36 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 342Catalina 36 MkII
General
ManufacturerHanseCatalina
Year2006–20101999–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)56.5 m² (608 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 0.67m longer than the Hanse 342. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 36 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · Catalina 36 MkII