Hanse 342 vs 2016 Dehler 36 SQ — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
2016 Dehler 36 SQ

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3422016 Dehler 36 SQ
General
ManufacturerHanseDehler
Year2006–20102016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyGermany
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)10.85 m (35.6 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)55 L (14.5 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
18.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
32.73
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
16.07

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 2016 Dehler 36 SQ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ at 10.85m (35.6ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ is 0.55m longer than the Hanse 342. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ, with an SA/D of 18.59 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has a comfort ratio of 16.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 32.7% for the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 55L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 2016 Dehler 36 SQ